Arjun panditrao khotkar judgement

Author: lphx

August undefined, 2024

WebARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR vs. KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL. Judgement Date : july/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 421 SC Read full Judgement . The State of Karnataka & Ors Vs. M/S Vedanta Limited (Formerly Known as Sesa Sterlite Limited) & Ors. [March 6, 2024] Judgement Date : ... Web8 set 2024 · Since Arjun Panditrao (supra) has not overruled Sonu alias Amar (supra), the ratio of that judgment will follow. As Arjun Panditrao (supra) has made it clear that it is …

A case regarding admissibility of Electronic Evidence.

Web15 giu 2001 · 1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent. 3. The petitioner challenges the order issued … WebDownload / Print SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Present: Justice R. F. Nariman, Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR – … hotspot manager wisp domitys.fr

Resolving The Conundrum: Section 65B Of The Indian Evidence …

WebLatest Versova Maharashtra News in Hindi: Lokmatnews.in Covers all Versova Live Updates in Hindi. Also Finds Versova Maharashtra Articles, Photos & Videos at Lokmat … Web20 lug 2024 · Finally, the reference to the larger Bench in Arjun Khotkar v. Kailash Gorantyal[1] was answered by the Three Judge Bench on 14th July 2024 apparently halting the swinging pendulum swinging... http://jkja.nic.in/archives/August_2024.pdf line dance tick tock ira

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal And …

Web14 lug 2024 · reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos.2082520826 of 2024 arjun panditrao khotkar …appellant versus kailash kushanrao … Web14 lug 2024 · Two election petitions were filed by the present Respondents before the Bombay High Court under Sections 80 and 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of the present Appellant, namely, Shri Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (who is the Returned Candidate [hereinafter referred to as the “RC”] belonging … hotspot login softwareWeb14 lug 2024 · The 3-judge bench in the present case, holding the Shafhi Mohammad judgment to be incorrect said, ... [Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao … line dance tip and turn

"Web14 giu 2024 · The respondents by their petitions had challenged the election of Appellant, Shri Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (who was the Returned Candidate, referred to as “RC”) of the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly. The subject matter of the case referred is that a set of four nomination papers were filed by the returned candidate. " - Arjun panditrao khotkar judgement

Arjun panditrao khotkar judgement

Web12 ago 2024 · Larger bench to decide whether filing a certificate under Section 65b(4) of evidence act is a mandatory provision Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal[1] The Supreme Court, in ... Web18 nov 2016 · T.V Nalawade, J. APLICATION IN EP NO. 74 OF 2016 IN ELECTIONI PETITION NO. 6 OF 2014: 1. The application is filed by respondent No. 1 to raise …

Did you know?

Web5 gen 2024 · The judgement in Arjun Pandit Rao case points out that on 23 April 2016, the conference of the Chief Justices of the High Courts, chaired by the Chief Justice of India, … WebArjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kusahanrao Goryantal ( MANU/SC/0521/ 2024 (SC) Indian Evidence , Act 1872 ... In a separate but concurring judgement, Justice V. Ramasubramanian also observed that with ever-changing developments in technology and considering amendments ...

Web15 lug 2024 · Ajrun Pantirao Khotkar vs. Kailash Gorantyal & Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024) was referred to a bench of three Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court by a Division Bench. The reference was made with regard to the interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Since the law laid down in State v. Web11 apr 2024 · The Appellant, Arjun Panditrao Khotkar challenged the judgment and order passed the by the High Court before the Supreme Court, inter alia, on the ground that the electronic record viz. CDs could not have been admitted into evidence without the certificate under Section 65B (4) of Evidence Act.

Web19 ago 2024 · Supreme court decision in the Arjun Pandit Rao case Three judge benches of Supreme court comprising Rohinton Fali Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, V. … WebPerspective vis-à-vis Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal AM- 11:00 AM SESSION 1 1:00 AM –12:30 PM Contemporary Trends in Constitutional Law: Recent Judicial Developments Proposed Scope of Discussion Judicial Limits: Competitive and Cooperative Federalism Art. 21 vis-à-vis Prohibition: Social and Legal Modalities

Web1 mag 2024 · In the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors, a three-judge bench of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, and V. Ramasubramanian observed that it has been a settled legal principle that the Evidence Act prohibits the proof of an electronic record by oral evidence if the requirements set out in …

WebJUDGMENT. R.F. Nariman, J. ... These appeals are dismissed with costs of INR One Lakh each to be paid by Shri Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (i.e. the Appellant in C.A. Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024) to both Shri Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Shri Vijay Chaudhary. V. Ramasubramanian. hot spot medicalWebDownload / Print SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Present: Justice R. F. Nariman, Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR – Appellant, Versus KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL and ors. – Respondents. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 20825-20826 OF 2024 with CIVIL APPEAL NO.2407 OF 2024, CIVIL … line dance tick tockWebPurnima Mathur (Impact of social media in the Law of Evidence), she talks about the admissibility of e-evidence in the courts of India, evidentiary value of social media posts in Indian courts and some international cases where social media posts are used as evidence in courts outside India. · line dance till the neons goneWebSJA e-NEWSLETTEROfficial Newsletter of Jammu & Kashmir Judicial Academy (For internal circulation only) Volume 3 Monthly August 2024 line dance titled whisky on the shelfWeb4 giu 2024 · Abstract. Supreme Court in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (2024) judgment has put an interesting exception to the S.65-B(4)’s certificate requirement: when even after applying to the relevant authority holding the electronic document sought to be proved in evidence and threafter to a court under procedural or evidence law, if the certificate cannot be … hotspot lunch antwerpenWeb8 apr 2024 · This article has is written by Santosh Subhash Pawar, betreibung a Get Course in Advanced Civil Litigation: Practice, Procedure and Drafting away LawSikho. Table of Contents IntroductionEvidencePrimary and secondary evidenceElectronic records as evidenceDifferent forms of digital recordsEvidence in the form of as DVD, CD, Hard … hot spot mallorca hot tubWebContributed by: P&A Law Offices On 14th July 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) delivered its judgment in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. … linedance to catch the rain